Monday, September 08, 2003

Dear Mr. Stinson

I have been in contact with your office in regard to a complaint that is before the RCMP Complaints Commission. I have been unable to obtain any meaningful response to my concerns and am therefore asking you to contact that office and solicit an official response on my behalf. Complaint PC#00657 -sent to assistant acting director Donald Pineau.

I am questioning what is legal behavior between the RCMP and their informants?
I was a witness to the abduction of Mindy Tran by RCMP agent Shannon Murrin.
I was assaulted and threatened during a home invasion perpetrated by people claiming to be the RCMP and who are actually suspected of being agents of the RCMP.
My bother has had to press charges against the RCMP for falsifying evidence that has made this home invasion appear to be drug related. The evidence is conclusive.

I know that there have been recent changes that allow for the RCMP to break the law, but are there no restrictions or guidelines that they must adhere to? Where are the checks and balances? A child killer is freely roaming the streets in Canada solely due to the actions of his RCMP handlers.

My question is this, is it legal for the RCMP to obstruct justice to benefit a child killer, solely due to the suspect’s status as an RCMP agent”? If this is not legal behavior, I ask why the RCMP superiors are not obtaining the available evidence that confirms these allegations? This includes what I had witnessed and the subsequent death threats believed to have originated from agents of the RCMP. If this is legal could I please be officially informed of this so that I can cease believing that I still need to get this evidence to a new and unbiased government department?

Thank you,

Sincerely David Ambrose